« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2007 BPO Calendar Information  (Read 17249 times)

Offline Stacey

  • Grand Master
  • ***
  • Posts: 652
  • Tonka
    • View Profile
    • myspace
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2006, 06:31:52 am »
I am doing everyone a favor and not submitting Tonka's pic for the calender.  I know that it would not be fair to the other dogs, for, the judges would have no other choice than to make Jan-Dec a picture of Tonka. 

Oh yeah, also, I am at my parents and do not have a picture on their computer to submit. :-[

Poor Tonka....poor poor Tonka. :'(  I can't wait to see the calendar though!   ;D
Logged
I am kind of a big deal!

Offline DixieSugarBear

  • Golden Paws
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2006, 08:12:16 am »
I just sent in Penny Lane, Dixie Darlin, and Sugar Bear.

Lisa
Logged
Lisa, owned by the following:
Sugar Bear - Great Pyrenees 4.5 yr.
Dixie Darlin - Great Pyrenees 4 yr.
Penny Lane - Great Pyrenees 2.5 yr.
Beauman - Great Pyrenees 14 months
Izzy - Great Pyrenees 14 month
Rosie - Great Pyrenees (at the bridge)

bigdogs@5501

  • Guest
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2006, 08:17:20 am »
Need a little help - the instructions said that the picture has to be at least 800k? Most of my pics are either 4 megapixel or 8 megapixels. Is that going to be ok?
Logged

Offline Tspanos

  • Big Paws-a-holic
  • **
  • Posts: 383
  • Tim
    • View Profile
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2006, 08:29:47 am »
Quote from: bigdogs@5501 on November 30, 2006, 08:17:20 am
Need a little help - the instructions said that the picture has to be at least 800k? Most of my pics are either 4 megapixel or 8 megapixels. Is that going to be ok?

A 4 megapixel picture should be around 1.6mb or 1,600K so as long as you send Jamie the full resolution pic it will be more than adequate. The 8 megapixel pic would allow Jamie to crop the photo and still have a large enough file so it would be even better, but either will work.
Logged

k2campbell

  • Guest
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #19 on: November 30, 2006, 08:49:12 am »
Quote from: Tspanos on November 30, 2006, 08:29:47 am
A 4 megapixel picture should be around 1.6mb or 1,600K so as long as you send Jamie the full resolution pic it will be more than adequate. The 8 megapixel pic would allow Jamie to crop the photo and still have a large enough file so it would be even better, but either will work.

Mine was 795 KB, I hope that's ok? 

Jaime please let me know if you don't get my pic (I just sent it a few hours ago).  If you need a bigger resolution I can get it, just let me know.

Thanks,
Kelly
Logged

Offline schelmischekitty

  • Chief "All Knowing"
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
    • View Profile
    • myspace
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2006, 09:06:53 am »
please let me know if the one i sent isn't big enough, i can send the original one, that isn't cropped
Logged
steffanie in atlanta

aiden (4), tristan (2), & maya (born sept. 17th)
axle-140ish-lb akita (4)
peanut-5lb, 11 months chihuahua
[img width= height= alt=Image Hosted by ImageShack.us]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3339/alltogethernowme6.jpg[/img]

Nicole

  • Guest
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2006, 08:25:23 pm »
hehehe...I THINK, and tell me if I'm wrong, Michael...that the 800K is the MAXIMUM, right? Not the minimum? So, you guys should be all good if its slightly under. I'd say that the 1600K one would be way too big.

I could be wrong, though!
Logged

Nicole

  • Guest
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2006, 08:28:15 pm »
oooh, Ok. Well, like I said...I thought I could be wrong. He said "As close to 800K as possible" sooo....

Logged

k2campbell

  • Guest
Re: 2007 BPO Calendar Information
« Reply #23 on: December 01, 2006, 09:19:50 am »
Quote from: Nicole on November 30, 2006, 08:28:15 pm
oooh, Ok. Well, like I said...I thought I could be wrong. He said "As close to 800K as possible" sooo....

That's what I thought too, "As close to 800K as possible"...

I guess we'll find out soon enough ;)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »